WORKPACKAGE 5.
Efficacy and Safety in Population Screening and Imaging of Sensitive Groups
Objectives
Description of work
Deliverables
Workpackage description
Whilst Detective Quantum Efficiency is generally accepted as the ultimate objective measure of image quality, it includes aspects of spatial resolution and noise for a delivered amount of X-ray quanta. It is proposed to extend this work, as several aspects need further attention and refinement.
It is proposed to undertake a survey to calculate the DQE for all available detector systems on the market by evaluating available data obtained. This includes slot scanning systems, for which a dedicated procedure will have to be established, and digital mammography systems for interventional work. A major difficulty for a routine assessment of the DQE is the measurement of the detector dose as it is not always possible to insert a dosemeter at the appropriate place. Moreover, solid state dosemeters may not be calibrated for this purpose. It is proposed to include aspects of spatial resolution and noise into a new quantity that relates these characteristics to entrance dose which is easy to measure in the field, rather than detector dose. Results obtained from the reviews of classical DQE assessment and the new quantity will be compared.
A method to assess the MTF for all detector positions to detect local problems of spatial resolution will be further automated and validated on different systems with resolution problems or in homogeneities.
Optimization of digital mammography systems includes many steps. Post processing and viewing conditions are recognized as being very critical components of the total digital mammography system. Previous approaches were based on CDMAM analysis the use of a phantom with small egg shells that simulate microcalcifications, and fully simulated lesions. This last tool is a new and particularly powerful approach to compare and optimize post processing settings and the look-up table of the monitors. It allows comparing the visibility of lesions on different systems. It is intended to study all the remaining problems for today. This includes:
Due to the wide dynamical range of digital mammography systems, the detector can be used with wide range in dose that may go largely undetected. Dose monitoring in digital mammography is important for two reasons: the doses may have important consequences regarding the benefit in screening mammography and it may be used as an indirect way to assess the technical stability of the systems. It is of the utmost importance, in particular in a screening organisation, that images are delivered with a certain quality that is constant over time and at the lowest possible dose.
The problem in digital mammography when compared to another procedures covered in SENTINEL is that doses can be expressed in very different ways (e.g. entrance dose with or without backscatter, mean glandular dose, detector dose). In a first phase, the relative value, the ease of data acquisition and the combined use and role of these quantities in the radiological practice will be studied. The applicability to patient dose monitoring and assessment of detector stability will be tested.
For these very new systems, automated dose retrieval should be established. The necessary parameters to be collected will be listed and these data will be communicated to the industry. Improved software approaches will be advised. Mean glandular doses will be calculated from a larger number of images in a series of centres using different digital mammography systems for a range of technique factors as part of an optimisation process.
Patient doses will be linked to image quality indicators of the mammographic images acquired with these systems and compared to the average doses acquired with conventional systems.
A complete new
generation of bone mineral densitometry scanners have been widely available
and is very popular. Whilst there is no formal screening, the level of public
awareness and interest amongst women's groups is such that it is now essential
that studies regarding its standardisation and optimisation are undertaken.
There is a potential for self referral on a regular basis. Clinical referral
criteria will need to be established by expert groups. As their equipment tends
to be used outside of traditional radiological settings there is a need for
training and understanding of safety issues. Paediatric radiology approaches
to patient dosimetry will be studied, in relation to population screening. This
will be used to propose methods of assessing reference dose levels, image quality
criteria and surveys of functional performance.